Posts Tagged ‘testing’
Testers Needed!
Usability testers for Projectrix and Hardwire needed!
Please visit these links and be nice hehe. Thanks! =)
PROJECTRIX (Eportfolio and Assessment Management System) – http://j.mp/testprojectrix
HARDWIRE (Personal Learning Environment) – http://j.mp/testhardwire
MyMathVentures JR First Testing (Phase 2)
Phase 2 includes the actual game playing, post test and survey. Here the kids played all the five games and answered a post test and a survey regarding their experience with the Wii Remote. We allowed them to play again any of the games that they liked. A lot of them requested to play Fishrithmetic over and over again because, according to them, it’s almost like real fishing.
MyMathVentures JR First Testing (Phase 1)
Phase 1 testing included pretest and familiarization. We gave the kids a little review on the topics included in the game and then gave them a pretest. After that we allowed them to play the games so that they could familiarize themselves with the Wii Remote. Read the rest of this entry »
Test Plan part 1
We will be testing MyMathVentures again, this time in Roosevelt College- Cainta. Read the rest of this entry »
Nav UP Test Methodology
Objectives:
To determine the effectiveness of the application in helping the user find their way around the university.
Effectiveness encompasses the program’s ability to guide the user, the user’s response time to it, and its advantages or disadvantages to conventional
alternatives for finding one’s way around the campus.(ie. maps, querying the security guards, etc)
Criteria/Metrics:
Speed for using the program (in locating a site)
Speed for using the alternatives (in locating a site)
Quantity of points of interests identified
Quantity of points of interests added
Cases:
Freshmen
-freshmen who, new to the campus do not know their way around. Since we cannot get ahold of really “fresh” first years we plan to use first years on
their second semester and use obscure or not well known buildings or sites (for a first year) as the points of interests to be tested. We intend to test
about 8-10 people from this category.
Older Students
-older students who, though may know about the surroundings quite well, may still not be aware of where particular sites are located. we intend to
use sites which do not come into the common know-how of regular students. We intend to test about 4-6 people from this category.
UPCAT takers (Not available)
-UPCAT takers may find the program useful, however as there are no UPCAT takers currently prowling around the university, we cannot procure test
subjects in this division.
Methodology:
There shall be three types of test. One which measures the time students take in trying to locate a site using the application and the alternatives. The
second of how many sites a student can identify. And the other consists of how the students use the add point of interest function in the field.
In the first test, there shall be typically two students A and B who shall be asked to locate a site, say site 01 using the program and an alternative
respectively. Their times shall be recorded as they finish by locating the site and getting there. They shall be given ample time allowance to not see which
direction each starts off.
Afterwards, students A and B shall swap methods of location (program and alternative), and be asked to locate another site, site 02. They shall also be timed
as they finish locating the site.
In the second test, students A and B shall be escorted along a stretch of road and be asked to identify the sites pointed out to them. They will have
different methods of identifying the sites. The number of sites pointed out correctly shall be noted.
In the third test, the students shall be escorted along a stretch of road and be asked to add points of interests they consider to be significant to be
noted. The number of sites added shall be noted.
